Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10885H outperforms Core i3-4160T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10885H is 2082 days newer than Core i3-4160T.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10885H
- Performs up to 3% better in Dead Space than Core i3-4160T - 152 vs 148 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160T - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i9-10885H - 35 vs 45 Watts
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-10885H
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Core i3-4160T
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10885H | vs | Intel Core i3-4160T |
|---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 45 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
