Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10885H outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10885H is 2033 days newer than Xeon E5-2650 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10885H
- Performs up to 10% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 134 vs 122 FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 45 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10885H - 20 vs 16 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i9-10885H
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Xeon E5-2650 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10885H | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 8 | Cores | 10 |
| 16 | Threads | 20 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
