Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms Core i7-965 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 3146 days newer than Core i7-965.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-965
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 130 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 7% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Core i7-965 - 131 vs 123 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-965 - 64 vs 8 threads
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-965
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-965 | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 17th, 2008 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Core i7 Extreme | Collection | EPYC |
| Bloomfield | Codename | Naples |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 32 |
| 8 | Threads | 64 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
