Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2667 v3 outperforms Core i7-965 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2667 v3 is 2121 days newer than Core i7-965.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-965
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 130 vs 135 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3
- Performs up to 4% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i7-965 - 160 vs 154 FPS
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Core i7-965
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Xeon E5-2667 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-965 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 17th, 2008 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Bloomfield | Codename | Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Ivy Bridge, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 135 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
