Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-950 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-950 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 4305 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-950.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-950
- Up to 44% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - $100.0 vs $179.99
- Up to 26% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-11600K - $1.11 vs $1.49 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 34% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-950 - 121 vs 90 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i7-950 - 125 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-950 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-950 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3061 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
121
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.49/FPS
74%
Price, $
$179.99
55%
FPS Winner
Buy for $179.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3061 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2009
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-950 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2009 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 125 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |