Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-7100T outperforms the more expensive Core i7-920 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-7100T is 2969 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-920.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-920
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100T - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Performs up to 5% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i7-920 - 133 vs 127 FPS
- Up to 49% cheaper than Core i7-920 - $48.1 vs $94.0
- Up to 51% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i7-920 - $0.36 vs $0.74 per FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Core i7-920 - 35 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-920 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 47 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
133
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48.1
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $48.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-920 | vs | Intel Core i3-7100T |
---|---|---|
Nov 17th, 2008 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
130 W | TDP | 35 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |