Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8809G outperforms FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-8809G is 1927 days newer than FX-4300.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8809G
- Performs up to 15% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than FX-4300 - 174 vs 151 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $48.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16691 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Feb 1st, 2018
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-8809G | vs | AMD FX-4300 |
---|---|---|
Feb 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Kaby Lake G | Codename | Vishera |
Intel BGA 2270 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
Radeon RX Vega M GH | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |