Buy on Amazon
$298.95
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700T outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-8700T is 1946 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700T
- Performs up to 7% better in God of War than Celeron G1610 - 173 vs 162 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 35 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i7-8700T - $37.0 vs $298.95
- Up to 87% better value when playing God of War than Core i7-8700T - $0.23 vs $1.73 per FPS
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel CM8068403358413 Core i7-8700T Prcsr Tray
Buy for $298.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19463 minutes ago
Intel Celeron G1610 2.60GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1610
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19461 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-8700T
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-8700T | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
