Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6900K outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6900K is 1316 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 1% better in Control than FX-6300 - 201 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 16 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 38% cheaper than Core i7-6900K - $74.04 vs $120.0
- Up to 38% better value when playing Control than Core i7-6900K - $0.37 vs $0.6 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 95 vs 140 Watts
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13911 minutes ago
Buy for $74.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13911 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6900K | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |