Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4460 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4460 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6900K is 751 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4460.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 2% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-4460 - 183 vs 180 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4460 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4460
- Up to 47% cheaper than Core i7-6900K - $64.04 vs $120.0
- Up to 45% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-6900K - $0.36 vs $0.66 per FPS
- Consumes up to 40% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 84 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6900K doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78243 minutes ago
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
FPS
180
98%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
100%
Price, $
$64.04
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $64.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78241 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6900K | vs | Intel Core i5-4460 |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | May 11th, 2014 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |