Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4160T outperforms Core i7-640LM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4160T is 1656 days newer than Core i7-640LM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-640LM
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i3-4160T - 25 vs 35 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Performs up to 11% better in World of Warcraft than Core i7-640LM - 168 vs 152 FPS
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i7-640LM
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Core i3-4160T
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-640LM | vs | Intel Core i3-4160T |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Arrandale | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
25 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 16.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
