Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2680 v3 outperforms Core i7-640LM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2680 v3 is 1705 days newer than Core i7-640LM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-640LM
- Consumes up to 79% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 25 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
- Performs up to 7% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i7-640LM - 125 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-640LM - 24 vs 4 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-640LM
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Xeon E5-2680 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-640LM | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Arrandale | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 12 |
| 4 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
25 W | TDP | 120 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 16.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
