Key Differences
In short — Core i7-5820K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-5820K is 365 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5820K
- Performs up to 2% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Celeron G3900 - 215 vs 211 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i7-5820K - $39.9 vs $429.95
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i7-5820K - 51 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-5820K doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $429.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75804 minutes ago
Buy for $39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75803 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
50.08620689655172%
Multi-Core
992
18.22524343193092%
Intel Core i7-5820K | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell E | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
140 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |