Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4820K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-4820K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 1874 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4820K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4820K
- Up to 51% cheaper than Core i9-9900K - $199.88 vs $405.0
- Up to 42% better value when playing Minecraft than Core i9-9900K - $0.32 vs $0.55 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 19% better in Minecraft than Core i7-4820K - 736 vs 621 FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Core i7-4820K - 95 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4820K - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-4820K doesn't have integrated graphics
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
621
84%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$199.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $199.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2192 minutes ago
Buy for $405 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2193 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4820K | vs | Intel Core i9-9900K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge E | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |