Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4820K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-4820K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 2501 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4820K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4820K
- Up to 50% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900XT - $199.88 vs $399.0
- Up to 43% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Ryzen 9 3900XT - $0.53 vs $0.93 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 13% better in Battlefield IV than Core i7-4820K - 430 vs 380 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Core i7-4820K - 105 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4820K - 24 vs 8 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
380
88%
Value, $/FPS
$0.53/FPS
100%
Price, $
$199.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $199.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2195 minutes ago
Buy for $399 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2195 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4820K | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge E | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |