Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4820K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-4820K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 3313 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4820K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4820K
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - $199.88 vs $469.99
- Up to 44% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i9-13900KF - $1.68 vs $3.01 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 31% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i7-4820K - 156 vs 119 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i7-4820K - 125 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4820K - 32 vs 8 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
119
76%
Value, $/FPS
$1.68/FPS
100%
Price, $
$199.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $199.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1785 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
156
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.01/FPS
55%
Price, $
$469.99
42%
FPS Winner
Buy for $469.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1785 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4820K | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge E | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |