Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Core i7-4820K vs Core i7-14700

Core i7-4820K vs Core i7-14700: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

Intel Core i7-4820K

3.7 GHz | 4-core

Intel Core i7-4820K Logo
Intel Core i7 i7-4820K 3.70 GHz Processor - Socket FCLGA2011 - Quad-core (4 Core) - 10 MB Cache - 5 GT/s DMI

Buy for $199.88 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 1912 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

Intel Core i7-14700

2.1 GHz | 20-core

Intel Core i7-14700 Logo
Intel Core i7-14700 Desktop Processor 20 cores (8 P-cores + 12 E-cores) up to 5.4 GHz

Buy for $399.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 1912 minutes ago

Intel Core i7-4820K

3.7 GHz | 4-core

Intel Core i7-4820K Logo
Intel Core i7 i7-4820K 3.70 GHz Processor - Socket FCLGA2011 - Quad-core (4 Core) - 10 MB Cache - 5 GT/s DMI

Buy for $199.88 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 1912 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

Intel Core i7-14700

2.1 GHz | 20-core

Intel Core i7-14700 Logo
Intel Core i7-14700 Desktop Processor 20 cores (8 P-cores + 12 E-cores) up to 5.4 GHz

Buy for $399.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 1912 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short — Core i7-14700 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4820K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-4820K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700 is 3781 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4820K.

Advantages of Intel Core i7-4820K

  • Up to 50% cheaper than Core i7-14700 - $199.88 vs $399.99
  • Up to 45% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i7-14700 - $1.32 vs $2.4 per FPS

Advantages of Intel Core i7-14700

  • Performs up to 11% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i7-4820K - 167 vs 151 FPS
  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4820K - 28 vs 8 threads
  • Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-4820K doesn't have integrated graphics
This is a free version of Red Dead Redemption 2.
Red Dead Redemption 2

Red Dead Redemption 2

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Highest

Intel Core i7-4820K Logo
Core i7-4820K

Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013


FPS

151

90%

Value, $/FPS

$1.32/FPS

100%

Price, $

$199.88

100%

Value Winner

Intel Core i7 i7-4820K 3.70 GHz Processor - Socket FCLGA2011 - Quad-core (4 Core) - 10 MB Cache - 5 GT/s DMI

Buy for $199.88 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 1912 minutes ago

Intel Core i7-14700 Logo
Core i7-14700

Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024


FPS

167

100%

Value, $/FPS

$2.4/FPS

55%

Price, $

$399.99

49%

FPS Winner

Intel Core i7-14700 Desktop Processor 20 cores (8 P-cores + 12 E-cores) up to 5.4 GHz

Buy for $399.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 1912 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Highest

Intel Core i7-4820K Logo
Core i7-4820K

Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013

Intel Core i7-14700 Logo
Core i7-14700

Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Core i7-4820K Logo
Core i7-4820K

Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013


Single-Core

658

24%

Multi-Core

2440

14%

Intel Core i7-14700 Logo
Core i7-14700

Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024


Single-Core

2719

100%

Multi-Core

16412

100%

Intel Core i7-4820K Logo

Intel Core i7-4820K

vs
Intel Core i7-14700 Logo

Intel Core i7-14700

Sep 1st, 2013Release Date
Jan 8th, 2024
Core i7CollectionCore i7
Ivy Bridge ECodenameRaptor Lake
Intel Socket 2011SocketIntel Socket 1700
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
4Cores
20
8Threads
28
3.7 GHz
Base Clock Speed2.1 GHz
3.9 GHzTurbo Clock Speed
5.4 GHz
130 WTDPNot Available
22 nmProcess Size
10 nm
37.0x
Multiplier21.0x
NoneIntegrated Graphics
UHD Graphics 770
Yes
OverclockableNo

Builds Using Core i7-4820K or Core i7-14700

Red Dead Redemption 2, 1920 x 1080, Highest

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.