Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4820K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-4820K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900 is 2060 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4820K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4820K
- Up to 41% cheaper than Core i9-9900 - $199.88 vs $339.0
- Up to 34% better value when playing Hogwarts Legacy than Core i9-9900 - $2.53 vs $3.85 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900
- Performs up to 11% better in Hogwarts Legacy than Core i7-4820K - 88 vs 79 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-4820K - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4820K - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-4820K doesn't have integrated graphics
Hogwarts Legacy
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
79
89%
Value, $/FPS
$2.53/FPS
100%
Price, $
$199.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $199.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2252 minutes ago
Buy for $339 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2253 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4820K | vs | Intel Core i9-9900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge E | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |