Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4820K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-4820K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 3313 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4820K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4820K
- Up to 30% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - $199.88 vs $284.0
- Up to 7% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-13600K - $1.28 vs $1.38 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 32% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-4820K - 206 vs 156 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i7-4820K - 125 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4820K - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-4820K doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
156
75%
Value, $/FPS
$1.28/FPS
100%
Price, $
$199.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $199.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 149 minutes ago
Buy for $284 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 149 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4820K | vs | Intel Core i5-13600K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge E | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 14 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |