Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms the more expensive Core i7-4765T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 1530 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-4765T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4765T
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 2% better in World of Tanks than Core i7-4765T - 526 vs 518 FPS
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i7-4765T - $221.76 vs $498.95
- Up to 56% better value when playing World of Tanks than Core i7-4765T - $0.42 vs $0.96 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4765T - 32 vs 8 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $498.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12122 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
526
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
100%
Price, $
$221.76
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $221.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12122 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4765T | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |