Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4610M outperforms Core i3-4160T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4610M is 170 days older than Core i3-4160T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4610M
- Performs up to 1% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i3-4160T - 126 vs 125 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Consumes up to 5% less energy than Intel Core i7-4610M - 35 vs 37 Watts
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-4610M
Mobile • Feb 1st, 2014
Core i3-4160T
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4610M | vs | Intel Core i3-4160T |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Haswell | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket G3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 37 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 30.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
