Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4610M outperforms Xeon E5-2670 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4610M is 219 days older than Xeon E5-2670 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4610M
- Performs up to 6% better in The Callisto Protocol than Xeon E5-2670 v3 - 99 vs 93 FPS
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 - 37 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4610M - 24 vs 4 threads
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-4610M
Mobile • Feb 1st, 2014
Xeon E5-2670 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4610M | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX |
| Intel Socket G3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 12 |
| 4 | Threads | 24 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
37 W | TDP | 120 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
