Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3770K outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-3770K is 177 days older than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770K
- Performs up to 3% better in Battlefield IV than FX-8320 - 382 vs 371 FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 77 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 42% cheaper than Core i7-3770K - $74.82 vs $129.57
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $129.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74140 minutes ago
Buy for $74.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74140 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3770K | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |