Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-7100 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3770K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-7100 is 1710 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3770K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Performs up to 8% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-3770K - 128 vs 119 FPS
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i7-3770K - $70.0 vs $175.0
- Up to 63% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-3770K - $0.55 vs $1.47 per FPS
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770K - 51 vs 77 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for $175 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1728 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
128
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.55/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1729 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3770K | vs | Intel Core i3-7100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
77 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |