Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-6800K outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3770K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-6800K is 1493 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3770K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770K
- Consumes up to 45% less energy than Intel Core i7-6800K - 77 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6800K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Performs up to 23% better in F1 23 than Core i7-3770K - 206 vs 167 FPS
- Up to 41% cheaper than Core i7-3770K - $103.0 vs $175.0
- Up to 52% better value when playing F1 23 than Core i7-3770K - $0.5 vs $1.05 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770K - 12 vs 8 threads
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $175 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1186 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
206
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.5/FPS
100%
Price, $
$103
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $103 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1188 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3770K | vs | Intel Core i7-6800K |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 140 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |