Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms Core i7-3632QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 1992 days newer than Core i7-3632QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3632QM
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 35 vs 54 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 1% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i7-3632QM - 156 vs 155 FPS
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
156
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
100%
Price, $
$68.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6591 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Mobile • Oct 19th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3632QM | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 54 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |