Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100 outperforms Core i7-3632QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-7100 is 1537 days newer than Core i7-3632QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3632QM
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i3-7100 - 35 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Performs up to 12% better in Lost Ark than Core i7-3632QM - 251 vs 224 FPS
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
251
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.28/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6383 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Oct 19th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3632QM | vs | Intel Core i3-7100 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |