Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the more expensive Core i7-2600 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 2426 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-2600.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 95 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 1% better in Monster Hunter: World than Core i7-2600 - 254 vs 251 FPS
- Up to 40% cheaper than Core i7-2600 - $109.99 vs $184.47
- Up to 41% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Core i7-2600 - $0.43 vs $0.73 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2600 - 16 vs 8 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $184.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 171 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
254
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
100%
Price, $
$109.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 173 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2600 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |