Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700 outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700 is 3725 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700
- Performs up to 17% better in Deathloop than FX-8320 - 197 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i7-13700 - $102.02 vs $319.99
- Up to 62% better value when playing Deathloop than Core i7-13700 - $0.61 vs $1.62 per FPS
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $319.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12139 minutes ago
Buy for $102.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12129 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-13700 | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |