Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9600KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 1300X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 1300X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9600KF is 530 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 1300X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600KF
- Performs up to 21% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen 3 1300X - 389 vs 322 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 1300X - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1300X
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i5-9600KF - $59.97 vs $180.12
- Up to 59% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i5-9600KF - $0.19 vs $0.46 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-9600KF - 65 vs 95 Watts
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
389
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.46/FPS
41%
Price, $
$180.12
33%
FPS Winner
Buy for $180.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 154 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
FPS
322
82%
Value, $/FPS
$0.19/FPS
100%
Price, $
$59.97
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $59.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 155 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9600KF | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 1300X |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |