Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9600KF outperforms the cheaper Athlon 200GE on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 200GE is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9600KF is 124 days newer than the cheaper Athlon 200GE.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600KF
- Performs up to 12% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Athlon 200GE - 110 vs 98 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 200GE - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 200GE
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i5-9600KF - $69.99 vs $180.12
- Up to 57% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-9600KF - $0.71 vs $1.64 per FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i5-9600KF - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
110
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.64/FPS
43%
Price, $
$180.12
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for $180.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8666 minutes ago
Buy for $69.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8665 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9600KF | vs | AMD Athlon 200GE |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 6th, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Athlon |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |