Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400F outperforms the cheaper Athlon 200GE on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 200GE is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14400F is 1950 days newer than the cheaper Athlon 200GE.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 200GE
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i5-14400F - $69.99 vs $209.99
- Up to 60% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i5-14400F - $0.57 vs $1.44 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 19% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Athlon 200GE - 146 vs 123 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 200GE - 16 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
FPS
123
84%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
100%
Price, $
$69.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $69.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 79 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
146
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.44/FPS
39%
Price, $
$209.99
33%
FPS Winner
Buy for $209.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 79 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 200GE | vs | Intel Core i5-14400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 6th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Athlon | Collection | Core i5 |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |