Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400 outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9400 is 2187 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400
- Performs up to 10% better in Elden Ring than FX-4300 - 121 vs 110 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-4300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 6 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i5-9400 - $48.02 vs $160.91
- Up to 67% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-9400 - $0.44 vs $1.33 per FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $160.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6389 minutes ago
Buy for $48.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6388 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9400 | vs | AMD FX-4300 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |