Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7600K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-7600K is 240 days older than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7600K
- Performs up to 5% better in Remnant II than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 89 vs 85 FPS
- Consumes up to 49% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 91 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 35% cheaper than Core i5-7600K - $109.99 vs $170.0
- Up to 32% better value when playing Remnant II than Core i5-7600K - $1.29 vs $1.91 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7600K - 16 vs 4 threads
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $170 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 111 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
85
95%
Value, $/FPS
$1.29/FPS
100%
Price, $
$109.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 111 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7600K | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
91 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |