Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G4900 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-760 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G4900 is 2816 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-760.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-760
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 1% better in Halo Infinite than Core i5-760 - 153 vs 152 FPS
- Up to 32% cheaper than Core i5-760 - $68.02 vs $100.0
- Up to 33% better value when playing Halo Infinite than Core i5-760 - $0.44 vs $0.66 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i5-760 - 54 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-760 doesn't have integrated graphics
Halo Infinite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 160 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
153
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
100%
Price, $
$68.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 160 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-760 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Jul 18th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Lynnfield | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 54 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |