Key Differences
In short — Core i5-760 outperforms the cheaper FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-760 is 771 days older than the cheaper FX-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-760
- Performs up to 1% better in Valheim than FX-4130 - 190 vs 189 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i5-760 - $22.92 vs $100.0
- Up to 77% better value when playing Valheim than Core i5-760 - $0.12 vs $0.53 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-760 doesn't have integrated graphics
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3543 minutes ago
Buy for $22.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3543 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-760 | vs | AMD FX-4130 |
---|---|---|
Jul 18th, 2010 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Lynnfield | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |