Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7400 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, both CPUs are the same in terms of value. The better performing Core i5-7400 is 240 days older than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 0% cheaper than Core i5-7400 - $109.99 vs $110.0
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400 - 16 vs 4 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $110 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 108 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
185
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.59/FPS
100%
Price, $
$109.99
100%
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 108 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7400 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |