Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3450 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-3450 is 1220 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450
- Performs up to 1% better in Alan Wake 2 than Celeron G3900 - 101 vs 100 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 32% cheaper than Core i5-3450 - $39.9 vs $59.0
- Up to 31% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Core i5-3450 - $0.4 vs $0.58 per FPS
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than Intel Core i5-3450 - 51 vs 77 Watts
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 124 minutes ago
Buy for $39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 124 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3450 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
77 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |