Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3330 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3330 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2796 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3330.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3330
- Up to 53% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $106.51 vs $225.0
- Up to 49% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i9-10900F - $0.83 vs $1.63 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 8% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-3330 - 138 vs 128 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i5-3330 - 65 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3330 - 20 vs 4 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
128
92%
Value, $/FPS
$0.83/FPS
100%
Price, $
$106.51
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $106.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7879 minutes ago
Buy for $225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7879 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3330 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |