Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3800X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3330 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3330 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 3800X is 2498 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3330.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3330
- Up to 64% cheaper than Ryzen 7 3800X - $106.51 vs $295.0
- Up to 56% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 7 3800X - $1.16 vs $2.63 per FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3800X - 77 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3800X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
- Performs up to 22% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-3330 - 112 vs 92 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3330 - 16 vs 4 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
92
82%
Value, $/FPS
$1.16/FPS
100%
Price, $
$106.51
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $106.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3800 minutes ago
Buy for $295 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3801 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3330 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3800X |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |