Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 2700X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3330 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3330 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 2700X is 2054 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3330.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3330
- Up to 49% cheaper than Ryzen 7 2700X - $106.51 vs $210.0
- Up to 42% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Ryzen 7 2700X - $0.59 vs $1.02 per FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 2700X - 77 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Performs up to 14% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i5-3330 - 205 vs 180 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3330 - 16 vs 4 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
180
87%
Value, $/FPS
$0.59/FPS
100%
Price, $
$106.51
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $106.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 205 minutes ago
Buy for $210 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 205 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3330 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |