Key Differences
In short — FX-8320 outperforms Core i5-3317U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-8320 is 144 days newer than Core i5-3317U.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3317U
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 17 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Performs up to 2% better in Dota 2 than Core i5-3317U - 167 vs 164 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3317U - 8 vs 4 threads
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
167
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.05/FPS
100%
Price, $
$175
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $175 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2169 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3317U | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |