Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600KF outperforms Core i5-3317U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12600KF is 3443 days newer than Core i5-3317U.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3317U
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than Intel Core i5-12600KF - 17 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12600KF
- Performs up to 43% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-3317U - 127 vs 89 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3317U - 16 vs 4 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
127
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.14/FPS
100%
Price, $
$144.59
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $144.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 218 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3317U | vs | Intel Core i5-12600KF |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |