Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G4900 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-2400 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G4900 is 2641 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-2400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 4% better in The Callisto Protocol than Core i5-2400 - 79 vs 76 FPS
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i5-2400 - $68.02 vs $249.99
- Up to 74% better value when playing The Callisto Protocol than Core i5-2400 - $0.86 vs $3.29 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i5-2400 - 54 vs 95 Watts
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $249.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 20 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
79
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.86/FPS
100%
Price, $
$68.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 26 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2400 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 54 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |