Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14600K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14600K is 2259 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14600K
- Performs up to 41% better in Rust than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 261 vs 185 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i5-14600K - $221.76 vs $626.98
- Up to 50% better value when playing Rust than Core i5-14600K - $1.2 vs $2.4 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-14600K - 32 vs 20 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
261
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.4/FPS
50%
Price, $
$626.98
35%
FPS Winner
Buy for $626.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12780 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
185
70%
Value, $/FPS
$1.2/FPS
100%
Price, $
$221.76
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $221.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12782 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-14600K | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 16 |
20 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |