Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14400F is 2321 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 20% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 124 vs 103 FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 48% cheaper than Core i5-14400F - $109.99 vs $209.99
- Up to 37% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-14400F - $1.07 vs $1.69 per FPS
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
124
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.69/FPS
63%
Price, $
$209.99
52%
FPS Winner
Buy for $209.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14250 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
103
83%
Value, $/FPS
$1.07/FPS
100%
Price, $
$109.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14251 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-14400F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |