Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-13600K outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-13600K is 2290 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 15% better in Hogwarts Legacy than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 97 vs 84 FPS
- Up to 1% cheaper than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $230.00 vs $232.12
- Up to 14% better value when playing Hogwarts Legacy than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $2.37 vs $2.76 per FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 125 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Hogwarts Legacy
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
97
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.37/FPS
100%
Price, $
$230
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $230 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 115 minutes ago
Buy for $232.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 116 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-13600K | vs | Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 140 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |