Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Core i5-13400 vs Celeron G4900

Core i5-13400 vs Celeron G4900: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

FPS Winner

Intel Core i5-13400

2.5 GHz | 10-core

Intel Core i5-13400 Logo
Intel® Core™ i5-13400 Desktop Processor 10 cores (6 P-cores + 4 E-cores) 20MB Cache, up to 4.6 GHz

Buy for $199 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 8148 minutes ago

vs

Intel Celeron G4900

3.1 GHz | 2-core

Intel Celeron G4900 Logo
Intel Celeron G4900 3.1 GHz Used Dual-Core Dual-Thread 54W CPU Processor LGA 1151

Buy for $53.55 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 8142 minutes ago

FPS Winner

Intel Core i5-13400

2.5 GHz | 10-core

Intel Core i5-13400 Logo
Intel® Core™ i5-13400 Desktop Processor 10 cores (6 P-cores + 4 E-cores) 20MB Cache, up to 4.6 GHz

Buy for $199 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 8148 minutes ago

vs

Intel Celeron G4900

3.1 GHz | 2-core

Intel Celeron G4900 Logo
Intel Celeron G4900 3.1 GHz Used Dual-Core Dual-Thread 54W CPU Processor LGA 1151

Buy for $53.55 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 8142 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short — Core i5-13400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400 is 1737 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.

Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400

  • Performs up to 36% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Celeron G4900 - 243 vs 179 FPS
  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 16 vs 2 threads

Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900

  • Up to 73% cheaper than Core i5-13400 - $53.55 vs $199.0
  • Up to 63% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i5-13400 - $0.3 vs $0.82 per FPS
This is a free version of Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition.
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition

Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Highest

Intel Core i5-13400 Logo
Core i5-13400

Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023


FPS

243

100%

Value, $/FPS

$0.82/FPS

36%

Price, $

$199

26%

FPS Winner

Intel® Core™ i5-13400 Desktop Processor 10 cores (6 P-cores + 4 E-cores) 20MB Cache, up to 4.6 GHz

Buy for $199 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 8148 minutes ago

Intel Celeron G4900 Logo
Celeron G4900

Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018


FPS

179

73%

Value, $/FPS

$0.3/FPS

100%

Price, $

$53.55

100%

Value Winner

Intel Celeron G4900 3.1 GHz Used Dual-Core Dual-Thread 54W CPU Processor LGA 1151

Buy for $53.55 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 8142 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Highest

Intel Core i5-13400 Logo
Core i5-13400

Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023

Intel Celeron G4900 Logo
Celeron G4900

Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Core i5-13400 Logo
Core i5-13400

Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023


Single-Core

2287

100%

Multi-Core

10364

100%

Intel Celeron G4900 Logo
Celeron G4900

Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018


Single-Core

616

26%

Multi-Core

1051

10%

Intel Core i5-13400 Logo

Intel Core i5-13400

vs
Intel Celeron G4900 Logo

Intel Celeron G4900

Jan 4th, 2023
Release DateApr 3rd, 2018
Core i5CollectionCeleron
Raptor LakeCodenameCoffee Lake
Intel Socket 1700SocketIntel Socket 1151
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
10
Cores2
16
Threads2
2.5 GHzBase Clock Speed
3.1 GHz
4.6 GHzTurbo Clock SpeedNon-Turbo
Not AvailableTDP54 W
10 nm
Process Size14 nm
25.0xMultiplier
31.0x
UHD Graphics 730Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 610
NoOverclockableNo

Builds Using Core i5-13400 or Celeron G4900

Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition, 1920 x 1080, Highest

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.