Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12500 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12500 is 1189 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12500
- Performs up to 12% better in Battlefield IV than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 459 vs 408 FPS
- Up to 22% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $175.95 vs $225.1
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12500 - 24 vs 12 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $175.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 82 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
408
88.88888888888889%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
$225.1
78%
Buy for $225.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 83 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
1274
55.12765036780615%
Multi-Core
7454
82.10155303447516%
Intel Core i5-12500 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Alder Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |