Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12400F is 614 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10320.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 3% better in F1 22 than Core i3-10320 - 286 vs 278 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i5-12400F - $120.0 vs $899.99
- Up to 86% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i5-12400F - $0.43 vs $3.15 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12400F doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
286
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.15/FPS
13%
Price, $
$899.99
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for $899.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 86 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
278
97%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
100%
Price, $
$120
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 85 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12400F | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |